<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workflow. Work. Flow.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maclitigator.com/2008/09/06/workflow-work-flow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maclitigator.com/2008/09/06/workflow-work-flow/</link>
	<description>Litigation &#38; trial technology for the rest of us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Adie</title>
		<link>http://www.maclitigator.com/2008/09/06/workflow-work-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maclitigator.com/?p=125#comment-625</guid>
		<description>not to throw spanners in proverbial works, but what happens if you have a client with multiple ongoing matters?

I operate on a similar line but have a cascade of folders

client -&gt; matter -&gt; subfolders.  

this means that i never get a list of active files from my folder architecture but I use other tools for that (more on which another time).

also like you i rely mainly on unstructured search for retrieval of files.  I recall attending an in-house meeting at my alma mater (magic circle firm in the uk) where I had been invited to advise on how to implement structured search for their new infobank.  This was in 1999.  a lot of thought had been put into it and the workgroup were clearly very pleased with what they had done and wanted a pat on the head. They were a bit put out when i told them that my advice was to ditch it all, ditch the parsing and tagging plans and instead OCR every document and buy a fulcrum server for FTI and natural language search.  Nowadays I would firmly add tagging back in, at two levels: a user can add their own tags to material and if two or more users add the same or similar tag, it would essentially become a &#039;public tag&#039;.

Turns out they implemented their idea. then 18 months later, ditched it and implemented mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to throw spanners in proverbial works, but what happens if you have a client with multiple ongoing matters?</p>
<p>I operate on a similar line but have a cascade of folders</p>
<p>client -&gt; matter -&gt; subfolders.  </p>
<p>this means that i never get a list of active files from my folder architecture but I use other tools for that (more on which another time).</p>
<p>also like you i rely mainly on unstructured search for retrieval of files.  I recall attending an in-house meeting at my alma mater (magic circle firm in the uk) where I had been invited to advise on how to implement structured search for their new infobank.  This was in 1999.  a lot of thought had been put into it and the workgroup were clearly very pleased with what they had done and wanted a pat on the head. They were a bit put out when i told them that my advice was to ditch it all, ditch the parsing and tagging plans and instead OCR every document and buy a fulcrum server for FTI and natural language search.  Nowadays I would firmly add tagging back in, at two levels: a user can add their own tags to material and if two or more users add the same or similar tag, it would essentially become a &#8216;public tag&#8217;.</p>
<p>Turns out they implemented their idea. then 18 months later, ditched it and implemented mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacLitigator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dropbox&#8230; Increased Storage Purchase Now Available.</title>
		<link>http://www.maclitigator.com/2008/09/06/workflow-work-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>MacLitigator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dropbox&#8230; Increased Storage Purchase Now Available.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maclitigator.com/?p=125#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] checking and checking, the pay for 50 gig option is now available on Dropbox. With Dropbox and the Workflow series, you can now duplicate your files to an offsite location, have a secure &#8216;anywhere [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] checking and checking, the pay for 50 gig option is now available on Dropbox. With Dropbox and the Workflow series, you can now duplicate your files to an offsite location, have a secure &#8216;anywhere [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacLitigator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Workflow&#8230; Channel the river, even the flood.</title>
		<link>http://www.maclitigator.com/2008/09/06/workflow-work-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>MacLitigator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Workflow&#8230; Channel the river, even the flood.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maclitigator.com/?p=125#comment-344</guid>
		<description>[...] the first of this series, we explored the document intake process and, unfortunatley, left out email. The failure to include [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the first of this series, we explored the document intake process and, unfortunatley, left out email. The failure to include [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie/Halo Secretarial</title>
		<link>http://www.maclitigator.com/2008/09/06/workflow-work-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie/Halo Secretarial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maclitigator.com/?p=125#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Great information here - I&#039;m so glad I&#039;ve been keeping up with the growing Twitter list on JDScoop - found you on Twitter and now your blog!  Take care!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information here &#8211; I&#8217;m so glad I&#8217;ve been keeping up with the growing Twitter list on JDScoop &#8211; found you on Twitter and now your blog!  Take care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
